A studio for bird study

Tag: evolution

Published in the Journal of Raptor Research: Defining Raptors and Birds of Prey

by Bryce W. Robinson

 

Raptor Cladogram

Figure 1 from McClure et al. 2019, ‘Defining raptors and birds of prey’ in the Journal of Raptor Research. Raptors, under our new definition, include all orders encompassed by the gray box in this figure. 

In the latest issue of the Journal of Raptor Research, colleagues and I, led by Chris McClure, published a commentary proposing a definition for the terms raptor and bird of prey. 

The definition is essentially all orders of core land birds (Telluraves) in which the majority of the members have maintained an ancestral raptorial condition. In other words, raptors or birds of prey belong to a group of birds that descended from an ancestor that had a raptorial lifestyle and morphology. The species that evolved from this common ancestor and maintained raptorial characteristics are thus considered raptors. This places the orders Accipitriformes, Cathartiformes, Falconiformes, and Strigiformes together as raptors, a grouping that is largely consistent with tradition. The big change is that this group also includes the order Cariamiformes, an order containing the two species of Seriemas from South America. This is the first time that Seriemas have been included as raptors (apart from a suggestion in Jarvis et al. 2014), but as we outline in the paper the natural history of the species along with its placement in the evolutionary grade cause it to fall under our current definition of raptor and bird of prey. So, welcome Seriemas to the Raptors!

As I stated above, the orders Accipitriformes, Cathartiformes, Falconiformes, and Strigiformes have all traditionally been considered raptors and birds of prey. But, there has also been considerable disagreement about the inclusion of some of these, such as Cathartiformes (New World vultures) and Strigiformes (owls). There has also long been discussion about the inclusion of shrikes (Lanidae) and ravens (Corvidae) because they either share some raptorial morphology and life history characteristics, or fulfill a similar ecological niche. This disagreement has caused many discussions in my life alone. I recall multiple discussions about whether or not Turkey Vultures are raptors, which stirred much of the conversation that led to my involvement in the publication of this paper.

Now, we don’t have to argue, Turkey Vultures are raptors. Since this definition is backed by much of the raptor research community, and is solidly outlined, defensible, and now published in the Journal of Raptor Research, I believe this new definition properly orients us to what is and is not a Raptor or Bird of Prey. We can now move forward and focus on the important work of conserving much of the members of this group.

Read “Defining raptors and birds of prey” open access here.

 

 

Advertisement

Idaho’s Endemic: The Cassia Crossbill (Loxia sinesciuris)

by Bryce W. Robinson

CACR-online-01

Cassia Crossbill (Loxia sinesciuris) and Rocky Mountain Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta latifolia). 11×14″ gouache on watercolor board. From top: Adult male, adult female, and juvenile. Original illustration donated to Golden Eagle Audubon Society in Boise, Idaho.

This article is an overview and summary of the Cassia Crossbill (Loxia sinesciuris), including it’s evolution, life history and distribution, taxonomic status, and conservation status and threats. Additionally, I’ve listed many resources available to get to know this excellent example of the processes of evolution in effect. This is a fluid post, meaning I will revise and add as I gather more material and information (such as photos, recordings, etc.) or as information becomes available through further studies of the species. My aim is to provide a resource from which curious birders and naturalists can delve into learning about this incredible species as well as provide a resource for seeking it out in southern Idaho. Any thoughts, suggestions, revisions, or additions are welcome.

INTRODUCTION

The Cassia Crossbill represents our continued refinement of understanding the natural world. How peculiar it seems that in the 21st century, while beginning to recognize and understand incipient speciation in some taxa, we are also finding well established independent evolutionary lineages that have until now gone unnoticed. Even more peculiar is that the Cassia Crossbill is certainly not restricted to a place where ornithologists and bird enthusiasts rarely visit. They breed in areas with extensive road networks and occupy ranges with nearly year round access. My point is that we certainly haven’t missed them, we have only overlooked them. I don’t consider this an embarrassment, I find it extremely exciting. How many other patterns such as this have we yet to notice?

This bird’s name, Cassia Crossbill (Loxia sinesciuris) is loaded with information and in my opinion aptly applied nomenclature. I commend those involved with choosing these names. Below is an explanation of this loaded nomenclature, as well as an overview of the evolution of the species, it’s distribution, what separates it from the Red Crossbill (Loxia curvirostra), why it was finally elevated to species level by the AOS Check-list committee, and threats to its future in our ever-changing world. I’ve also included a list of resources from which I’ve extracted the information I present here.

THE EVOLUTION OF THE CASSIA CROSSBILL

The first aspect of the Cassia Crossbill’s loaded name is its species epithet, sinesciuris. Although I already knew about the unique situation that gave rise to the divergence of this species, I hadn’t put much thought to this name. I now realize the etymology of the word – “sin” meaning “without”, and “sciuris” referring to squirrels. So, the scientific name means “Loxia without-squirrel” – an excellent transition into the proximate reason this species developed in this small area in southern Idaho.

The South Hills and Albion Mountains in southern Idaho are unique in the respect that they lack a primary mammalian seed predator, the red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). Rocky Mountain lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta latifolia) in this region are thus relieved of this predatory pressure, however one important seed predator occurs in the region, the Cassia Crossbill. The crossbill fills the void of the squirrel, spurring a unique relationship that has resulted in the divergence of this crossbill type from the Red Crossbill complex (Benkman 2009).

From this absence of squirrels, lodgepole pine in this region has been relatively free of pressures on one aspect of the trees biology, serotiny. Serotinous cones are cones that remain closed until they are heated by fire. Because red squirrels are a selective agent against serotiny, the frequency of serotinous cones in South Hills and Albion Mountains has increased due to the squirrels’ absence. This has resulted in a large seed bank that is utilized by the Cassia Crossbill, an important aspect in it’s evolutionary trajectory.

A relatively stable and abundant food resource has given rise to a unique life history strategy of this crossbill when compared to the Red Crossbill. The Cassia Crossbill is sedentary. Furthermore, the crossbill as a primary predator and the pine as a primary food source are coupled in their life history, and thus locked in an ‘evolutionary arms-race’ where one species develops ‘armaments’ and defenses to lessen predation pressures whilst the other develops ‘weapons’ and tools to better access this resource, the seeds. This coupled relationship acts in selection and causes divergence of traits, such as we see between these two taxa where the crossbill has developed a larger bill relative to Red Crossbill types. From this relationship, a new species of crossbill has arisen.

LIFE HISTORY AND DISTRIBUTION – What separates L. sinesciuris from L. curvirostra?

The other part of the Cassia Crossbill’s loaded name refers to its relatively minuscule range, when compared to that of its sister species the Red Crossbill. This species occurs in only two counties, the core being in Cassia County, a truly uncommon trait for taxa in North America (See Fig. 1, and also be sure to check out the eBird data for this species).

65625621-1280px

Morphologically, Cassia Crossbill’s have a larger bill than Red Crossbill, and average larger in body mass (Benkman et al.  2009). Otherwise, it is difficult to distinguish the two sister species from appearance alone and in fact judging bill size in the field is entirely unreliable.

A better distinguishing characteristic, and one that is actually quite discernible is the call type. Cassia Crossbills have a much dryer and sharper call note than other Red Crossbill types, a difference that can be quite distinctive when heard in the field. Additionally, observers can record crossbills and look at the spectral characteristics of the call notes to identify between Cassia Crossbill, and all other Red Crossbill types (spectrograms to come soon from my own recordings). eBird has published an excellent article detailing each call type, their identification, the distributions of each, and some brief information on their biology (Young and Spahr 2017).

Additionally, the songs of the Cassia Crossbill differs from Red Crossbill in consisting of more buzzy notes (rather than whistled), and have more repetitive syllables (Benkman et al. 2009). I hope to record some songs later this year (2018) and include a spectrogram here.

Cassia Crossbill range also hosts two Red Crossbill types on occassion (Types 2 and 5). Although these taxa occur in sympatry, Cassia Crossbill mate assortatively at an extremely high rate, resulting in reproductive isolation which is a key mechanism for divergence.

The Cassia Crossbill also differs from Red Crossbill through shifted and set phenology of life history events. It has a more seasonal breeding strategy relative to the sporadic breeding nature of the nomadic Red Crossbill, where their breeding initiates at relatively the same time each year (Benkman et al. 2009). Additionally and related to their sedentary lifestyle and regular breeding cycle, the Cassia Crossbill molts at the same time in the late summer until early fall each year (ibid).

 

TAXONOMIC DECISION

In the 58th supplement to the American Ornithological Society’s Check-list of North American Birds (Chesser et al. 2017), the committee approved the nomination to elevate Cassia Crossbill to species level based on high levels of reproductive isolation, and genomic differences.

CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREATS

Because of the small and restricted range of this species, it’s particular life history, and the predicted impacts of climate change in the region, the Cassia Crossbill has an uncertain future. Compounding these impacts are threats to lodgepole pine such as shifted fire regimes and the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae), which have the potential to extirpate lodgepole pine from south central Idaho (see Benkman 2016 for a discussion of these threats).

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

For a brief guide to finding and identifying Cassia Crossbill, visit: https://idahobirds.net/birding-idaho/cassia-crossbill/

REFERENCED LITERATURE:

 

American Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus) Illustration with a Note on the Evolution of Cinclidae

by Bryce W. Robinson

AMDI-online-01.jpg

American Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus). 11×14″ gouache on watercolor board. 

I enjoy supplementing each illustration I do with a bit of deeper discussion pertaining to the subject at hand. Because I’m beginning more in-depth study of evolutionary history and relationships in birds, I’ll give a brief synopsis of our current understanding (thanks to Gary Voelker) of the evolution of the five species belonging to the dipper family (Cinclidae) and the origins of the American Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus) to complement this illustration.

Although the phylogenetics (genetic history) of dippers was published in 2002, and thus utilized mitochondrial data to inform the inferences I’ll lay out below, I suspect applying new techniques wouldn’t change the outcome much. That’s just a hunch, and revisiting the phylogenetics with next generation sequencing methods is certainly warranted and needed.

Mitochondrial data shows two important evolutionary points:

  • Dippers (Cinclidae) are most closely related to Thrushes (Turdidae).
  • Dippers originated in the old world, where they diverged and colonized the new world later (~4 million years ago).

Fun and interesting information for understanding dipper diversity.

If you are a dipper lover and you’d like a print, you can purchase one here:

http://ornithologi.bigcartel.com/product/11×14-limited-giclee-print-american-dipper

Referenced literature:

Voelker, G. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of dippers (Cinclus). Ibis 144(4):577 – 584.

Dark-eyed Junco Subspecies in Idaho’s Winter

by Bryce W. Robinson

Juncos_ID-online-01.jpg

For the Junco lovers that like this image, you can purchase a print by clicking on the image above.

Above is an illustration I just completed of some select subspecies of one of my favorite birds, the Dark-eyed Junco (Junco hyemalis) – Male and female “Oregon” (J. h. oreganus), “Pink-sided” (J. h. mearnsi), “Cassiar” (J. h. cismontanus), and the nominate “Slate-colored” (J. h. hyemalis). I think the junco is a favorite because it is polytypic, with some excellent variation in phenotypes throughout its range. I particularly am drawn to the Cassiar Junco because it is both difficult to diagnose (separate from Slate-colored X Oregon intergrades, if they even are different!) and little understood. For more information on this taxon, check out these links:

http://ebird.org/content/nw/news/dark-eyed-junco-races-oregon-slate-colored-and-cassiar/

http://nwbackyardbirder.blogspot.com/2011/04/not-slate-colored-junco-cassiar-junco.html

Here is information on its current and past taxonomic status:

https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/species.jsp?avibaseid=DED1C8F9EE711FCF

I also like the Dark-eyed Junco because from what we understand regarding it’s phylogenetics, it is a very recent radiation. Speciation well in process! See this article for an explanation:

Click to access POSTPRINT%20Mol%20Ecol%2025(24)%206175-6195%20(2016).pdf

Further, be sure to educate yourself with the Junco Projects great film – Ordinary Extraordinary Junco. I included a chapter of the film below that discusses the diversification of the species.

 

My illustration comprises the candidate subspecies that make up Junco flocks here in western Idaho. I chose to illustrate the male and female Oregon because they are by far the most common and provide the point with which to contrast and compare any outliers. The others are males, so as to provide simple examples of the other subspecies. Of course first-year and female types of these taxa can blend in appearance with the rest, which makes things much more challenging and fun.

Here I’ve included a rough and disorganized compilation of some information on what we currently understand about the Dark-eyed Junco and its sister species. There is a lot more out there, so if you love this as much as I do then be sure to explore more.

Here is a link and a few  references to investigate.

https://borjamila.com/speciation-mechanisms-junco-radiation/

Milá, B., P. Aleixandre, S. Alvarez-Nordström and John McCormack. 2016. More than meets the eye: lineage diversity and evolutionary history of dark-eyed and yellow-eyed juncos. In Snowbird: Integrative biology and evolutionary diversity in the junco. Ellen D. Ketterson and Jonathan W. Atwell (Eds.), Chicago University Press, Chicago.

Miller, A. H. 1942. Speciation in the Avian Genus Junco. The American Naturalist 76:211-214