A studio for bird study

Tag: finch

Recording Evening Grosbeak Calls in the South Hills

by Bryce W. Robinson

Female Evening Grosbeak - Coccothraustes vespertinus.

Female Evening Grosbeak – Coccothraustes vespertinus.

Last weekend I journeyed to the Sawtooth National Forest in Southern Idaho. I was focused on recording the “South Hills” subspecies of the Red Crossbill. Due to the absence of Red Squirrel in the South Hills, the Lodgepole Pine of that area are absent of a seed predator, save the Red Crossbill. As such, the Red Crossbill have a steady food supply throughout the year, causing them to be resident rather than the typical seasonal nomadism of other Red Crossbills. The relationship with the Lodgepole Pine has become an arms race of sorts, where tree and bird are adapting one after another to overcome the each others adaptive advantage. This in turn has shaped the morphology of the crossbills. They are now distinct in morphological characters such as bill shape, but they are also distinct in call type which is likely a result of their long isolation from other crossbill populations. Thus is the reason for my interest in obtaining an audio recording. For a more complete story about the “South Hills” Red Crossbill (Type 9), see Benkman et al. 2009.

This is all in depth (and perhaps unnecessary) background to why I ventured to the South Hills. Regardless, I spent hours searching all areas that I was able, but to no avail. I couldn’t find the crossbills. Some roads were not open due to remaining snow, so my ability to search was limited. Still, I was disappointed. The birding was good nonetheless. So much so, in fact, that I was able to find another project to augment the absence of the Crossbills.

I found a small flock of Evening Grosbeak, a nomadic mountain dwelling finch that one does not happen upon enough.  The grosbeaks were vocal, so I took the opportunity to record their calls. After all, I didn’t want to leave empty handed. I’m happy I did, because after some research I’ve discovered that the Evening Grosbeaks are like the Red Crossbill, as they too have a number of distinct call types that correspond to particular groups. At the moment there are 4 recognized types.

Male Evening Grosbeak - Coccothraustes vespertinus

Male Evening Grosbeak – Coccothraustes vespertinus

Here is the recording I took of the Evening Grosbeak vocalizations:


From the spectrograms of this series of calls, I was able to identify the call type for this group, which corresponds to geographical origin and even perhaps subspecies (Sewall et al. 2004). The call type for these birds is Type 1 as we would expect in this area. Type 1 is a group that inhabits the northwestern portion of the range of the Evening Grosbeak. Below I’ve presented the first spectrogram of an identifiable call note in black and white, followed by a colored spectrogram. I couldn’t decide which was more attractive. Forgive the formatting of the spectrograms as well, I’m just starting to get a hang of how to produce these images.


Figure 1. Two call notes given by an Evening Grosbeak. Time is shown on the x-axis in seconds, and frequency is shown on the y-axis in kHz. The call note on the left is the typical sweep call not unlike the flight call. This is the signature referred to as Type 1. The second call is a broad-band fluttered call. This particular bird was giving paired calls most often as illustrated, but at times calls were paired as two sweep calls (figure 2). Note the fundamental (darkest) with the first harmonic above each call.

Figure 1 shows a paired call, where the second call is quite different. The bird I was recording was repeating this sequence. I’ll need to research further to discover what the role of particular calls are, if it is even known. It is curious why these calls are paired, and why at times the bird would switch to a pair of the same call note (figure 2).


Figure 2. Paired call of Evening Grosbeak, both as sweep Type 1 calls. This paired call was less common than the pair seen in figure 2 for the individual calling.

I’ve been learning quite a bit about bioacoustics, the role of sound in nature, and how to properly analyze sounds using particular software. I decided to take on this objective to test my ability to go into the field, find my subject, get a proper recording, look at the sound using software, produce spectrograms, and communicate ideas. I “failed” at my objective of finding my target subject, but in doing so I stumbled upon something that taught me quite a bit. I’m happy about that, as it is a lesson in making an effort. Inevitably there is always something to gain.

Perhaps one of the most important discoveries that came from recording the grosbeaks was finding an eBird article discussing one Ph.D. students aspirations to catalogue the different types of calls, where the true boundaries are, and how much intermixing happens between individuals where type boundaries occur. The students name is Aaron N. K. Haiman at University of California, Davis. He has requested that anyone and everyone record call notes of Evening Grosbeaks and share with him. So, I’ll be sending him my recordings along with the information on location, time of day, etc. to give the recording context.

All in all, I’d say I had a Saturday well spent.

Referenced Information:

Benkman, C.W., J.W. Smith, P.C. Keenan, T.l. Parchman, and L. Santisteban. 2009. A new species of Red Crossbill (Fringillidae: Loxia) from Idaho. The Condor 111(1):169–176

Sewall, K., R. Kelsey, and T.P. Hahn. 2004. Discrete variants of Evening Grosbeak flight calls. The Condor 106:161–165



Some Notes on the Gray-crowned Rosy Finch- Leucosticte tephrocotis

by Bryce W. Robinson


Juvenile “tephrocotis” Gray-crowned Rosy Finch. Brooks Range, Alaska. July

Caitlin Davis recently shared some photos with me of a small group of Gray-crowned Rosy Finches that visited her this fall at the Goshutes in eastern Nevada. The photos showed two different types of Gray-crowned Rosy Finch, one with gray cheeks, the other with brown. The photos reminded me of the flocks I saw while counting migrants there last fall. I remember seeing the two cheek colors, along with a few Black Rosy Finches intermixed in the flocks, which was exciting. My exposure to the birds did not end with the Goshutes. Over the course of the winter I saw a number of birds, and studied the differences in plumage that I observed.

Adult "Tephrocotis" Gray-crowned Rosy Finch. Goshutes Mountains, Nevada. October

Adult “tephrocotis” Gray-crowned Rosy Finch. Goshutes Mountains, Nevada. October

"Hepburns" Gray-crowned Rosy FInch. Goshutes Mountains, Nevada. October.

“Hepburns” Gray-crowned Rosy FInch. Goshutes Mountains, Nevada. October.

The two types of plumage illustrated in Caitlin’s photos are a function of subspecies. There are six recognized subspecies in North America, most easily distinguished by the color of their cheek. Three subspecies have gray cheeks, while the others have brown cheeks. The”Hepburns”, a coastal gray cheeked group ranging from Alaska to northern California, winters in the interior west with another group, a brown cheeked bird, the nominate tephrocotis, an interior subspecies ranging from the Brooks Range of northern Alaska to the Rocky Mountains of the lower 48.

"Tephrocotis" (left) and "Littoralis" or "Hepburns" (right). Goshutes Mountains, Nevada. October.

“tephrocotis” (left) and “littoralis” or “Hepburns” (right). Goshutes Mountains, Nevada. October.

I find it interesting that these birds form these large flocks, intermixed with obviously separate populations. What this speaks to is the nature of flocking in this species. I’d love to track each group, as they break apart with the onset of spring, and then form into their winter groups with the inception of fall.

After the past winter, I found an interest in the small fringillid. I spent a bit of time studying and learning parameters of the subspecies. After making plans to drive to the great north, I realized the potential of seeing the tephrocotis at the northern extent of its range. That thought was ultimately exciting, but even more so was my excitement when I actually found a small group in the Brooks Range of northern Alaska. I was only able to get photos of one cooperative juvenile, regrettably. The adults were very shy, and stayed far from range of my lens.

I plan to locate some flocks this winter, in hopes of studying the birds in the field and getting some additional photographs. What I would like to work out is the ability to sex each individual, and hopefully find a bird in its first basic plumage. I’ve learned some of the characteristics of each sex, now I just need to test those in the field.

After reviewing a photo from last winter, I noticed an aspect of the birds plumage I haven’t read about or heard of. In the photo below, the bird has a great deal of black on the cheeks, rather than brown or grey. This is worth some thought, and one of the reasons I’m anxious to find a large flock and see if there are other instances of variability. Perhaps it is an expression from a lineage closely tied to the Black Rosy Finch. After all, I’ve heard buzz of the possibility of the North American Rosy Finches being once again lumped as a single species. It would be fun to really get to the bottom of how different each population truly is.

"Hepburns" Gray-crowned Rosy Finch, exhibiting a great deal of ashy black on its cheek. West Desert of Utah, January.

“Hepburns” Gray-crowned Rosy Finch, exhibiting a great deal of ashy black on its cheek. West Desert of Utah, January.

Maybe, if I have some luck this winter and really get to know this species, I can illustrate what I’ve learned about how to distinguish individuals to age, sex, and subspecies. And the intellectual journey continues.


Referenced information:

Macdougall-Shackleton, Scott A., Richard E. Johnson and Thomas P. Hahn. 2000. Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch (Leucosticte tephrocotis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/559 doi:10.2173/bna.559 Accessed 11/10/2013