A studio for bird study

Tag: nature

Recording Evening Grosbeak Calls in the South Hills

by Bryce W. Robinson

Female Evening Grosbeak - Coccothraustes vespertinus.

Female Evening Grosbeak – Coccothraustes vespertinus.

Last weekend I journeyed to the Sawtooth National Forest in Southern Idaho. I was focused on recording the “South Hills” subspecies of the Red Crossbill. Due to the absence of Red Squirrel in the South Hills, the Lodgepole Pine of that area are absent of a seed predator, save the Red Crossbill. As such, the Red Crossbill have a steady food supply throughout the year, causing them to be resident rather than the typical seasonal nomadism of other Red Crossbills. The relationship with the Lodgepole Pine has become an arms race of sorts, where tree and bird are adapting one after another to overcome the each others adaptive advantage. This in turn has shaped the morphology of the crossbills. They are now distinct in morphological characters such as bill shape, but they are also distinct in call type which is likely a result of their long isolation from other crossbill populations. Thus is the reason for my interest in obtaining an audio recording. For a more complete story about the “South Hills” Red Crossbill (Type 9), see Benkman et al. 2009.

This is all in depth (and perhaps unnecessary) background to why I ventured to the South Hills. Regardless, I spent hours searching all areas that I was able, but to no avail. I couldn’t find the crossbills. Some roads were not open due to remaining snow, so my ability to search was limited. Still, I was disappointed. The birding was good nonetheless. So much so, in fact, that I was able to find another project to augment the absence of the Crossbills.

I found a small flock of Evening Grosbeak, a nomadic mountain dwelling finch that one does not happen upon enough.  The grosbeaks were vocal, so I took the opportunity to record their calls. After all, I didn’t want to leave empty handed. I’m happy I did, because after some research I’ve discovered that the Evening Grosbeaks are like the Red Crossbill, as they too have a number of distinct call types that correspond to particular groups. At the moment there are 4 recognized types.

Male Evening Grosbeak - Coccothraustes vespertinus

Male Evening Grosbeak – Coccothraustes vespertinus

Here is the recording I took of the Evening Grosbeak vocalizations:

http://www.xeno-canto.org/236817

From the spectrograms of this series of calls, I was able to identify the call type for this group, which corresponds to geographical origin and even perhaps subspecies (Sewall et al. 2004). The call type for these birds is Type 1 as we would expect in this area. Type 1 is a group that inhabits the northwestern portion of the range of the Evening Grosbeak. Below I’ve presented the first spectrogram of an identifiable call note in black and white, followed by a colored spectrogram. I couldn’t decide which was more attractive. Forgive the formatting of the spectrograms as well, I’m just starting to get a hang of how to produce these images.

BWR_EVGR_01

Figure 1. Two call notes given by an Evening Grosbeak. Time is shown on the x-axis in seconds, and frequency is shown on the y-axis in kHz. The call note on the left is the typical sweep call not unlike the flight call. This is the signature referred to as Type 1. The second call is a broad-band fluttered call. This particular bird was giving paired calls most often as illustrated, but at times calls were paired as two sweep calls (figure 2). Note the fundamental (darkest) with the first harmonic above each call.

Figure 1 shows a paired call, where the second call is quite different. The bird I was recording was repeating this sequence. I’ll need to research further to discover what the role of particular calls are, if it is even known. It is curious why these calls are paired, and why at times the bird would switch to a pair of the same call note (figure 2).

BWR_EVGR_02

Figure 2. Paired call of Evening Grosbeak, both as sweep Type 1 calls. This paired call was less common than the pair seen in figure 2 for the individual calling.

I’ve been learning quite a bit about bioacoustics, the role of sound in nature, and how to properly analyze sounds using particular software. I decided to take on this objective to test my ability to go into the field, find my subject, get a proper recording, look at the sound using software, produce spectrograms, and communicate ideas. I “failed” at my objective of finding my target subject, but in doing so I stumbled upon something that taught me quite a bit. I’m happy about that, as it is a lesson in making an effort. Inevitably there is always something to gain.

Perhaps one of the most important discoveries that came from recording the grosbeaks was finding an eBird article discussing one Ph.D. students aspirations to catalogue the different types of calls, where the true boundaries are, and how much intermixing happens between individuals where type boundaries occur. The students name is Aaron N. K. Haiman at University of California, Davis. He has requested that anyone and everyone record call notes of Evening Grosbeaks and share with him. So, I’ll be sending him my recordings along with the information on location, time of day, etc. to give the recording context.

All in all, I’d say I had a Saturday well spent.

Referenced Information:

Benkman, C.W., J.W. Smith, P.C. Keenan, T.l. Parchman, and L. Santisteban. 2009. A new species of Red Crossbill (Fringillidae: Loxia) from Idaho. The Condor 111(1):169–176

Sewall, K., R. Kelsey, and T.P. Hahn. 2004. Discrete variants of Evening Grosbeak flight calls. The Condor 106:161–165

http://ebird.org/content/me/news/evening-grosbeak-flight-call-types-how-much-overlap-occurs/

Singing Sagebrush Sparrow

by Bryce W. Robinson


I took this clip the other day in the Sagebrush strewn landscape of southwestern Idaho. I recorded the video by digiscoping using my ZEISS Diascope 65 T* FL. Normally, Sagebrush Sparrows are busy singers and will generally tolerate you in the area so long as you don’t pay them too much attention. But for whatever reason, no matter how far I was the sparrows on this morning were extra timid. On top of that, the wind wasn’t helping. Due to the wind and the distance from the bird, you can’t really hear the singing. To add one more difficulty to getting the song recorded, there was a lone bull nearby that was constantly growling. I didn’t know bulls growl… So, there is room for improvement for recording video of a singing Sagebrush Sparrow.

Anyway, I’m still pleased with the outcome. I do think I need an external, directional microphone for recording singing birds. Digiscoping really caters to sparrows and other passerines that are more flighty, but it doesn’t capture the song well. Still, It’s really nice to have quality glass to help with the effort. I’m really excited to apply the technique to some of Alaska’s more timid birds this summer, such as the singing Arctic Warbler and displaying Bluethroat.

Gyrfalcon T-shirts

by Bryce W. Robinson

2015-04-07 00.00.00

We have Gyrfalcon T-shirts for sale on the ornithologi`art shop until April 20th. Click the photo or follow the shop link for pricing, sizes, and color options. Represent the Gyrfalcon project and get a shirt!

GYRF

Female Barn Owl “Spottiness” Signals Genetic Quality

by Bryce W. Robinson

2015-03-19 16.34.51

To begin, I should have illustrated the frontside of this Barn Owl to illustrate the concept I’m about to present. I did not, however, have “spottiness” in mind when I began the illustration, so I decided to illustrate the backside. I find the back patterning mesmerizing.

So, for the concept you’ll just have to imagine the frontside of this bird, being spotted throughout.

Ornamentation in birds is generally considered a male’s way to communicate their quality to females. A more ornamented, vibrant, decorated, etc. male is generally considered higher quality, thus driving selection for particular traits (Peacock is an easy example, but think about birds like the Greater Sage-grouse as well).

Studies supporting this theory have generally focused on males, and for good reason. Males tend to be the showier sex. But, what about species where females exhibit unique markings?

Barn Owls are one species where the female shows more markings (spots) than males. Additionally, studies support that female Barn Owls are not the choosers in breeding, as per usual. Because of these reasons, Roulin et al. (2000) decided to test the theory that heavier spotted females were of higher quality (tease out the mechanisms of spottiness). They hypothesized that females with more spots also had higher levels of specific antibodies important for parasite resistance.

Their study looked into immunocompetence of offspring. They found support for the idea that heavier spottiness communicates immunocompetence, but also may be a “heritable signal of parasite resistance”. This is important for Barn Owls, as they nest in cavities and tight spaces. I remember a few weeks ago I went with a peer, Tempe, to check on a Barn Owl nest for her Master’s Project. The box held four owls (lower than normal), and was full of feces and dead animal remains. In such situations, parasites and all sorts of things may run rampant. Having higher resistance then becomes advantageous, and ways of communicating such resistance will then be selected for and prevail. Makes sense (eureka?).

Literature Referenced:

Roulin, A, T. W. Jungi, H. Pfister, and C. Dijkstra. 2000. Female Barn Owls (Tyto alba) Advertise Good Genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 267 pp. 937-941